tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4703647205422258651.post8047710847356472694..comments2007-09-25T22:16:03.556-07:00MorganWilkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18176582503792687616noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4703647205422258651.post-80174067396723262912007-09-25T22:16:00.000-07:002007-09-25T22:16:00.000-07:00And yet, for going on a week, all of their content is provided ... by you. I guess you own the place, except for the plagiarized bits, of course.Wulfgarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00899418721847001124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4703647205422258651.post-8626584599916756252007-09-25T12:51:00.000-07:002007-09-25T12:51:00.000-07:00I do not know anything about the Montana Pundit being plagiarist. <BR/><BR/>I was asked if some of my articles could be posted on their blog and I said that I had no problem with that. <BR/><BR/>That is the extent of my involvment.MorganWilkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18176582503792687616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4703647205422258651.post-25273293712926730592007-09-25T12:48:00.000-07:002007-09-25T12:48:00.000-07:00Morgan, there is a blog in Montana called <A HREF="http://mtpundit.com" REL="nofollow">Montana Pundit</A> claiming that you write for them, even though they are <A HREF="http://mtpundit.com/?p=25" REL="nofollow">admitted plagiarists</A>. Is this so? You are listed on their <A HREF="http://mtpundit.com/?page_id=2" REL="nofollow">authors page</A> and they have posted several of your stories. Why would you join forces with plagiarists?SimpleQuestionnoreply@blogger.com